One size does not fit all: universal cuff overestimates oscillometric blood pressure in persons with large arm circumference.

OBJECTIVE: Some brachial cuffs for oscillometric blood pressure (BP) measurement are claimed to cover a wide range of upper-arm circumferences; however, their validation is rarely conducted. Our aim was to compare oscillometric BP measurements obtained with a universal cuff with those obtained with an appropriately sized cuff. METHODS: We utilised the Microlife B6 Connect monitor, conducting oscillometric BP measurements in a random sequence with both a universal cuff (recommended for arm circumferences from 22 to 42 cm) and an appropriately sized cuff (medium for circumference 22-32 cm and large for 32-42 cm). We included 91 individuals with an arm circumference of 22-32 cm and 64 individuals with an arm circumference of 32-42 cm. RESULTS: For arm circumferences > 32 cm, systolic and diastolic BP measured with the universal cuff was higher than that measured with the large cuff (systolic 6.4 mmHg, 95% confidence interval [CI]). 3.9-8.8, diastolic 2.4 mmHg, 95%CI, 1.2-3.7, p < 0.001 for both). Overestimation of BP with the universal cuff was statistically significant after correcting for the sequence of measurements. No statistical difference was found between the universal cuff and medium cuff for circumferences in the 22-32 cm range. The bladder size in the universal cuff matched the dimensions of the medium-sized cuff; however, the cuff was larger. CONCLUSION: Overestimation of BP measured with a universal cuff in persons with large arm circumferences is clinically important. It poses the risk of unnecessary initiation or intensification of antihypertensive medication in persons using the universal cuff.

What is the context?Clinical guidelines recommend individualisation of the size of the cuff used for blood pressure measurement according to the circumference of the upper arm.Many blood pressure monitors are sold with a single "universal" cuff claimed to cover a wide range of upper arm sizes.We compared blood pressure obtained with the Microlife B6 Connect monitor and a "universal" cuff with the results obtained with individual sized cuffs (medium size for arm circumference between 22 and 32 cm and large size for arm circumference between 32 and 42 cm).What is new?In persons with large upper arm circumference is the systolic blood pressure 6.4 mmHg higher and the diastolic blood pressure 2.4 mmHg higher with the universal cuff than with the individual-sized large cuff.What is the impact?The universal cuff overestimates blood pressure in persons with large arm circumference.

T-score differences and nonprogression in lumbar vertebrae as predictors of vertebral fractures.

PURPOSE: In case of a vertebral fracture, the area of the vertebrae decreases with a concomitant increase in BMD, as assessed by a DXA scanning. Furthermore, a vertebral fracture may disrupt the normal increase in vertebral body area from L1 to L4 (nonprogression). We aimed to examine associations between T-score difference and nonprogression of vertebral area and vertebral fractures. METHODS: We identified 100 patients with 1 or more fractures in L1-L4 and 106 patients without fractures. All patients had undergone a DXA scan and a lumbar spine X-ray. In fracture patients, we recorded T-score difference between the fractured vertebra and the adjacent vertebra, and whether the fractured vertebra was smaller than the one above (nonprogression). In nonfracture patients, the greatest positive T-score difference was recorded, and nonprogression was present if vertebral area did not increase successively from L1 to L4. RESULTS: With a T-score difference ≥1 SD odds ratio for fracture was 1.30 (0.74-2.29). Sensitivity and specificity were 0.40 and 0.66, respectively. With T-score difference ≥1.5 SD, odds ratio for fracture was 2.26 (1.08-4.73). Sensitivity and specificity were 0.24 and 0.88, respectively. Nonprogression was very common in the no-fracture group (38%), while only 23% of X-ray verified fractures had nonprogression. CONCLUSION: A randomly found T-score difference ≥1.5 SD between adjacent vertebrae on a DXA scan is associated with a small increased risk of compression fracture. Nonprogression is very common in patients without fractures.

Prevalence and Risk of Vertebral Fractures in Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Nested Case-Control Study.

Prevalence of vertebral fractures (VFx) in primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) remains uncertain. We aimed to estimate the prevalence of VFx, investigate potential risk factors associated with VFx, and whether bone mineral density (BMD) differs between PHPT and osteoporotic patients with VFx. Through the Danish National Patient Register, we identified patients diagnosed with PHPT from 2005 to 2015. The diagnosis was verified by reviewing biochemical findings, and X-ray reports were reviewed by two investigators. Osteoporotic patients with VFx were identified from our outpatient clinic and matched on age and sex with PHPT patients with VFx. We identified 792 PHPT patients among whom spine X-ray was available from 588 patients. VFx were present in 122 (21%) patients and were equally frequent among sexes (77% females). Fractured patients were older (70 versus 63 years) and had lower heights (163 versus 166 cm) compared with nonfractured patients (p all < 0.02). After stratification by age groups, the prevalence of VFx differed significantly between sexes (p < 0.01). Ionized calcium and parathyroid hormone did not differ between groups. BMD at total hip and forearm were lower in fractured compared with nonfractured patients (p < 0.03 for both) after adjusting for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). Compared with osteoporotic patients with VFx (n = 108), BMD at the lumbar spine was higher in PHPT patients with VFx (n = 108) (p < 0.01). This did not change by excluding patients with lumbar VFx (p < 0.01). The severity of PHPT assessed by biochemistry does not seem to be associated with risk of VFx. Compared with osteoporosis, VFx seems to occur at a higher BMD in PHPT. © 2018 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[Dapsone-induced decrease in the HbA(1c) level may cause artefacts in diabetic control]. / Dapsoninduceret fald i HbA(1c) kan give et falskt billede af diabeteskontrollen.

Glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) level is used to monitor glycaemic control in diabetic patients, and has recently been included as a diagnostic factor for type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). A 50-year-old male with well-controlled type 1 DM, Mb Addison and coeliac disease was diagnosed with dermatitis herpetiformis and treated with dapsone. Subsequently, the patient presented a pronounced drop in HbA(1c) levels without changes in blood glucose levels. S-fructosamine values were in agreement with the previous stable HbA(1c) values. Blood analyses showed inappropriately low HbA(1c) values due to mild haemolysis and shortening of erythrocyte lifetime without anaemia.